
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 16,940).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅+68.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+68.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 16,940).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 16,940 — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 68.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1657 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 16,940+68% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 11.03 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+5% | 1657 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3.3 MB+251% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 120% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 45W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 376.4+573% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GB206 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #156 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













