G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 204.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

2025

Why buy it

✅104.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
702.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 104.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 163.3% in PassMark G3D (26,498 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 70 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 204.9% (40.4 vs 13.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 163.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2055 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
G3D Mark Score	10,064	26,498+163%
Architecture	Pascal	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	8960+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	36.83 TFLOPS+315%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2055 MHz+19%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	160	280+75%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	8.8 MB+836%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 125% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 192-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	24 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	432 GB/s+125%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	9th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 25% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
TDP	180W	140W-22%
Recommended PSU	400W-38%	650W
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	55.9	189.3+239%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 87.5% cheaper ($1750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 203.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP	$249-88%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	40.4+204%	13.3
Codename	GP104	GB203
Release	May 27 2016	March 18 2025
Ranking	#137	#48

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.