
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 35,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅+252.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌863.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+252.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 35,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌863.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 771 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 797 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 797 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 371 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 752 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 688 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 564 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 35,431 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 252.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2407 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 35,431+252% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10496+310% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS+469% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2407 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 328+105% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 10.3 MB+996% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — a 433.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+433% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-10% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 177.2+217% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 89.6% less ($2150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.8 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 173% better value. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+173% | 14.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | GB203 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













