
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,316 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 707% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 600W, a 420W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 304mm, a 131mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅161.2% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌3339.8% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 600W vs 180W.
- ❌75.7% longer card at 304mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,316 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 707% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 600W, a 420W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 304mm, a 131mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅161.2% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌3339.8% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 600W vs 180W.
- ❌75.7% longer card at 304mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 283 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 326.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2407 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 42,899+326% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 24064+840% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+1205% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2407 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 160 | 752+370% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 23.5 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 400% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 960 GB/s+400% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-70% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 71.5+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 97.1% less ($8316 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 708% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-97% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+708% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GB202 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













