G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅79.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $8,316 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12502% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 600W, a 420W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
3339.8% HIGHER MSRP
$8,565 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 600W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 266.4% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 2,747), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $8,316 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12502% (40.4 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 2,747 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 266.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2617 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
G3D Mark Score	10,064+266%	2,747
Architecture	Pascal	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	24064+840%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	126 TFLOPS+1320%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2617 MHz+51%
ROPs	64	192+200%
TMUs	160	752+370%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	23.5 MB+2400%
L2 Cache	2 MB	128 MB+6300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — a 833.3% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	1792 GB/s+833%
Bus Width	192-bit	512-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	128 MB+6300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
TDP	180W-70%	600W
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2	2
Perf/Watt	55.9+1115%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 97.1% cheaper ($8316 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 13366.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP	$249-97%	$8565
Performance per Dollar	40.4+13367%	0.3
Codename	GP104	GB202
Release	May 27 2016	March 18 2025
Ranking	#137	#609

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.