
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+31.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 173mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 173mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40.6% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅+31.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 173mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 173mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40.6% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T1000 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and T1000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the T1000's 7,649 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 31.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+32% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+255% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+24% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the T1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 153.0+174% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 28.9% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 84.5% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+84% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













