
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+128.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $7,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6967.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla K20Xm: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla K20Xm is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 235W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla K20Xm
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,403 vs 10,064).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌2992% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌30.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla K20Xm
2012Why buy it
- ✅+128.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $7,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6967.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla K20Xm: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla K20Xm is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 235W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,403 vs 10,064).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌2992% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌30.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla K20Xm?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K20Xm still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla K20Xm

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K20Xm
Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla K20Xm's 4,403 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 128.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+129% | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2688+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+125% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+329% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K20Xm relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 26.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-23% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+199% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96.8% less ($7450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6 (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 6633.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-97% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+6633% | 0.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #137 | #473 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













