
GeForce GTX 1060

Tesla K40c
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla K40c Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+123.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $7,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6822.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Tesla K40c is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla K40c
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2992% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla K40c's 4,495 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 123.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+124% | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2880+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+76% | 5.046 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+98% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+300% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K40c leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 30.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-27% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+205% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 96.8% cheaper ($7450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 6633.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-97% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+6633% | 0.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK180 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #137 | #465 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















