
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 659.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 659.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M40 24GB better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Tesla M40 24GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 10,641 — the Tesla M40 24GB leads by 5.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,641+6% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+30% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+56% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.1 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 24GB has 8 GB. The Tesla M40 24GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+31% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 87.5% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 662.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+662% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM200 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













