
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+61.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 549.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅+61.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 549.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla M6?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M6 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla M6

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla M6's 6,225 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 61.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+62% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+145% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+47% | 1180 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+67% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+67% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M6 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 62.3+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 551.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+552% | 6.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













