
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1850.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,808).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅+17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2188.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1850.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,808).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2188.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla P40

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla P40's 11,808 — the Tesla P40 leads by 17.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,808+17% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+13% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+18% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.6% less ($5450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1823.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1824% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













