
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 260W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,558).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅+24.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 260W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+24.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,558).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T10 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Tesla T10?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla T10

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the Tesla T10 leads by 24.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,558+25% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The Tesla T10 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-31% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+16% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 87.5% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 541.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+541% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #137 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













