GeForce GTX 1060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+196.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 19.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 3,390 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 196.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 16 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+197% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+2567% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 142.9% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 30W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 113.0+102% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 19.2% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $100-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+19% | 33.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1060 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
