
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 280W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅98.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 280W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅98.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN RTX better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and TITAN RTX

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the TITAN RTX leads by 99.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 20,095+100% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1770 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 4.5 MB+379% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 250% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 672 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 43.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-36% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 71.8+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 405% better value. The TITAN RTX is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+405% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













