
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 295W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 13,949 — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti leads by 5.2%. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673+5% | 13,949 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432 | 4096+68% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+9% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L1 Cache | 0.89 MB | 1 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 89.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 484 GB/s+89% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 48.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-39% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5+72% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 31.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+31% | 28.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #161 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












