
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design better than GRID P40-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-2Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and GRID P40-2Q

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

GRID P40-2Q
GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the GRID P40-2Q reaches 9,581 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,842+3% | 9,581 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.648 TFLOPS+17% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1379 MHz+17% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-2Q has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the GRID P40-2Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (GRID P40-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.6+101% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GRID P40-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5699 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #358 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













