
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 8 and the Radeon 8040S is on rank 216, so the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8040S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8040S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Radeon 8040S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 8040S.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $400 for the Radeon 8040S, it costs 63% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 169% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+169%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,842 | 9,756 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.648 TFLOPS | 5.734 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1379 MHz | 2800 MHz+103% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 70.6% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 55W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.6 | 177.4+107% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design costs 62.5% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 168.9% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-63% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.6+169% | 24.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | June 27 2017 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #358 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















