
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 56.5% higher G3D Mark score and 37.5% more VRAM (11 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+56.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-56.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+37.5%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $145 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, it costs 3% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 61.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($145) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti leads by 56.5%. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,606+56% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.34 TFLOPS+26% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1755 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 88+175% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+180% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 2.5 MB+92% |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB+38% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 37.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 116.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB+38% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s+116% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+175% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB+38% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 112mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.4 | 91.5+23% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $145, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti costs 3.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 128.3 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 61.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $249-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $145-3% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 128.3+62% | 79.3 |
| Codename | GP102 | GA106 |
| Release | March 10 2017 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #95 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















