G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER instead at 10,186 vs 10,119, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1485 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	10,186	10,119
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.416 TFLOPS+45%	3.041 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+16%	1485 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	1.3 MB+30%	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	288 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
DirectX	12.1	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	101.9	202.4+99%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
MSRP	$159	—
Codename	TU116	TU116
Release	November 22 2019	April 23 2020
Ranking	#258	#324

Search GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.