G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $590 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
✅Delivers 343.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A1000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
❌40.5% longer card at 229mm vs 163mm.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅15.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 163mm instead of 229mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
371.1% HIGHER MSRP
$749 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A1000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.2% in PassMark G3D (10,814 vs 10,186), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER makes the most sense to buy today. It is $590 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $749, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 343.7% (64.1 vs 14.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A1000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the RTX A1000 leads by 6.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1462 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score	10,186	10,814+6%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280	2304+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.416 TFLOPS	6.737 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+18%	1462 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+11%	72
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	2.3 MB+77%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	163mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	101.9	216.3+112%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER came in at $159, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 78.8% cheaper ($590 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 345.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	RTX A1000
MSRP	$159-79%	$749
Performance per Dollar	64.1+345%	14.4
Codename	TU116	GA107
Release	November 22 2019	April 16 2024
Ranking	#258	#251

Search GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.