G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Tesla T4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Tesla T4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,721 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1086.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Tesla T4

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
1082.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,880 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (10,186 vs 10,153), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,721 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $1,880, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1086.2% (64.1 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Tesla T4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Tesla T4

The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1590 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
G3D Mark Score	10,186	10,153
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280	2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.416 TFLOPS	8.141 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+8%	1590 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	2.5 MB+92%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla T4 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T4 carries 8 GB. Tesla T4 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 256-bit on the Tesla T4. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 76°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
TDP	100W	70W-30%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-1%	76°C
Perf/Watt	101.9	145.0+42%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER came in at $159, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 91.5% cheaper ($1721 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 1087% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Tesla T4
MSRP	$159-92%	$1880
Performance per Dollar	64.1+1087%	5.4
Codename	TU116	TU104
Release	November 22 2019	September 13 2018
Ranking	#258	#260

Search GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on Amazon

Search Tesla T4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.