GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?

The matchup between the high-efficiency GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the original budget icon GeForce GTX 1650 reveal the monumental jump in entry-level performance. The SUPER variant delivers roughly 30-40% more rendering muscle, representing the transition from a robust 1080p core to a world-class powerhouse that masters modern settings with cinematic ease.

Technically, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER wins on absolute hardware depth across every metric—featuring faster GDDR6 memory and a significantly higher core count compared to the original Turing entry. While the GeForce GTX 1650 remains a robust engine for low-power budget builders, it lacks the overall throughput and memory bandwidth needed for uncompromised graphics in 2026. Moving to a SUPER-class engine is a transformative upgrade for any enthusiast seeking world-class speed on a budget.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and future-proof immersion. it is a world-class engine for high-end 1080p digital environments. The GeForce GTX 1650 remains the winner for users on existing budget rigs who priority the lowest power draw and reliable performance for entry-level tasks. however, for any user seeking uncompromised speed and raw muscle, the SUPER card is the clear and superior winner.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+29.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-29.4%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $81 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+19.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER leads by 29.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
10,186+29%
7,869
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1280+43%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.416 TFLOPS+48%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1725 MHz+4%
1665 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+43%
56
L1 Cache
1.3 MB+48%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+50%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
101.9
104.9+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $81, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 7.4% less ($6 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.8 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 19.9% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$159
$149-6%
Avg Price (30d)
$81
$75-7%
Performance per Dollar
125.8+20%
104.9
Codename
TU116
TU117
Release
November 22 2019
April 23 2019
Ranking
#258
#323