
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅133.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 122.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 22,651+122% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4352+240% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+400% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2535 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 4.3 MB+231% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-38% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 141.6+39% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER came in at $159, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 60.2% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 12.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-60% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+13% | 56.8 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD106 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #258 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













