G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 285W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅171.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
402.5% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌185% higher power demand at 285W vs 100W.
❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 171.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 210% in PassMark G3D (31,578 vs 10,186), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, and 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER makes the most sense to buy today. It is $640 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.1% (64.1 vs 39.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 210%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2610 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score	10,186	31,578+210%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280	7680+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.416 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS+808%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	2610 MHz+51%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	80	240+200%
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	7.5 MB+477%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	504 GB/s+163%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 96.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP	100W-65%	285W
Recommended PSU	350W-50%	700W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	229mm	285mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	101.9	110.8+9%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER came in at $159, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 80.1% cheaper ($640 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 62.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP	$159-80%	$799
Performance per Dollar	64.1+62%	39.5
Codename	TU116	AD104
Release	November 22 2019	January 3 2023
Ranking	#258	#11

Search GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.