
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 77 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 10,186 — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER leads by 29.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 10,186+29% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.3 MB+48% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+3% | 101.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 21.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-6% | $159 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 64.1+21% |
| Codename | TU117 | TU116 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | November 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #258 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













