G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅118.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅118.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 118.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 7,525 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is a 2012 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012 and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 118.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $150 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	94 FPS	35 FPS
medium	83 FPS	24 FPS
high	70 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	28 FPS
medium	74 FPS	17 FPS
high	60 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	10 FPS
medium	39 FPS	7 FPS
high	27 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	136 FPS	92 FPS
medium	113 FPS	59 FPS
high	94 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	28 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	64 FPS
medium	62 FPS	33 FPS
high	44 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	30 FPS
medium	27 FPS	17 FPS
high	21 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	10 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	323 FPS	339 FPS
medium	283 FPS	271 FPS
high	205 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	254 FPS
medium	202 FPS	203 FPS
high	151 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	127 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	169 FPS
medium	117 FPS	135 FPS
high	79 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	76 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	261 FPS	129 FPS
medium	211 FPS	95 FPS
high	191 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	55 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	76 FPS
medium	158 FPS	56 FPS
high	135 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	41 FPS
medium	74 FPS	29 FPS
high	65 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti reaches 7,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5%	7,525
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+17%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+109%	1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+1300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	192 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 6 (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 4
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W	0W-100%
Power Connector	None	None
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75
Perf/Watt	104.9	150.5+43%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 0.7% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 5.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).