G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅53.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
87.2% HIGHER MSRP
$279 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 62% in PassMark G3D (12,747 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $279, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.6% (52.8 vs 45.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 12,747 — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti leads by 62%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1770 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,869	12,747+62%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.437 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1770 MHz+6%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.5 MB+70%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	288 GB/s+125%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 7th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
TDP	75W-38%	120W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	106.2+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 46.6% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 15.5% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
MSRP	$149-47%	$279
Performance per Dollar	52.8+16%	45.7
Codename	TU117	TU116
Release	April 23 2019	February 22 2019
Ranking	#323	#204

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.