GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX Titan
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX Titan Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX Titan FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX Titan: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 544.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX Titan is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX Titan across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013Why buy it
- ✅17.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌570.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX Titan Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the GeForce GTX Titan reaches 8,181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX Titan uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 8,181+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2688+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.709 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+90% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 224+300% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+300% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX Titan carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX Titan gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX Titan. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) — the GeForce GTX Titan has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 288 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (GeForce GTX Titan). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX Titan's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (GeForce GTX Titan). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+221% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.2 (GeForce GTX Titan) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 543.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-85% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+544% | 8.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | GK110 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | February 19 2013 |
| Ranking | #323 | #311 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX Titan
