GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅225.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 251.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GeForce MX130 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 225.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 336% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,805), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 251.1% (52.8 vs 15.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce MX130's 1,805 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 336%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1242 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX130
G3D Mark Score	7,869+336%	1,805
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+213%	0.9539 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+34%	1242 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX130 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 40 GB/s (GeForce MX130) — a 220% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX130.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s+220%	40 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX130
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+74%	60.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce MX130 launched at $120. On MSRP, GeForce MX130 was 19.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.0 (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 252% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX130
MSRP	$149	$120-19%
Performance per Dollar	52.8+252%	15.0
Codename	TU117	GM108
Release	April 23 2019	November 17 2017
Ranking	#323	#713

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce MX130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.