GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX230

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅265.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 333.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce MX230 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌650% higher power demand at 75W vs 10W.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 75W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 265.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 330.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,826), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 333.8% (52.8 vs 12.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce MX230's 1,826 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 330.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce MX230 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (GeForce MX230). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1582 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX230
G3D Mark Score	7,869+331%	1,826
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+250%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+268%	0.81 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+5%	1582 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+250%	16
L1 Cache	896 KB+833%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX230
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX230 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 GB/s (GeForce MX230) — a 166.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX230. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX230) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX230
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s+167%	48 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce MX230's 10W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce MX230). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX230
TDP	75W	10W-87%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	182.6+74%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce MX230 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce MX230) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 332.8% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX230
MSRP	$149	$150
Performance per Dollar	52.8+333%	12.2
Codename	TU117	GP108
Release	April 23 2019	February 21 2019
Ranking	#323	#708

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce MX230 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.