
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce MX450
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅52.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌67.8% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce MX450's 3,720 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 111.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+112% | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+6% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX450 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX450.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s+60% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 148.8+42% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 40.4% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.9 (GeForce MX450) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 254.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+254% | 14.9 |
| Codename | TU117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















