G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce PCX 5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce PCX 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22533.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅GeForce PCX 5750 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

GeForce PCX 5750

2010

Why buy it

✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 22382.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 35), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22533.7% (52.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce PCX 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce PCX 5750

The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 22382.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
G3D Mark Score	7,869+22383%	35
Architecture	Turing	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+87%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+112%	1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	60+7%
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1 MB+59%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+59%	0.63 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
DirectX	12+33%	9.0a
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+207%	1.5
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	None
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
TDP	75W-66%	219W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	104.9+52350%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce PCX 5750
MSRP	$149	$150
Performance per Dollar	52.8+26300%	0.2
Codename	TU117	GF110
Release	April 23 2019	December 7 2010
Ranking	#323	#497

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce PCX 5750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.