
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅82.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅82.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 61 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 128 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)'s 11,353 — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) leads by 44.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1890 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 11,353+44% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3072+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS+289% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1890 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3 MB+241% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 336 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)'s 115W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-35% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+6% | 98.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | AD107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #102 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













