
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 36.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 215W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅116.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 36.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 215W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅116.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 779 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 204 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 142 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 9 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,166 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER's 18,166 — the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads by 130.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.062 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 18,166+131% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 9.062 TFLOPS+204% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 160+186% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER's 215W — a 96.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-65% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+24% | 84.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 70.1% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 36.4 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 45.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+45% | 36.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU104 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | July 9 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #97 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













