
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2287 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,014 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)'s 15,014 — the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) leads by 90.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,192 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2287 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 15,014+91% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 8192+814% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2287 MHz+37% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile). Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)'s 80W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-6% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 187.7+79% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GN22-X9 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













