
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 11 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅161.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅175% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (11 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌570.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 21,513 — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads by 173.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 21,513+173% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 13.45 TFLOPS+351% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+8% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 88+175% |
| TMUs | 56 | 272+386% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.3 MB+389% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 5.5 MB+450% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti carries 11 GB. GeForce RTX 2080 Ti gives you 175% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — a 381.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 352-bit on the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 11 GB+175% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 616 GB/s+381% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 352-bit+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 5.5 MB+450% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+22% | 86.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 21.5 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 145.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-85% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+146% | 21.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #66 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















