
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,494).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅+20.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+20.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,494).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 102 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile's 9,494 — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile leads by 20.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 9,494+21% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+11% | 1500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile's 60W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 60W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 158.2+51% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GN20-P0 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #286 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













