
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2021Why buy it
- ✅203.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅203.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 215 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 215 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,108 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU's 19,108 — the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU leads by 142.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,240 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 19,108+143% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10240+1043% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+1043% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 56 | 320+471% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10 MB+1036% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 512 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5th gen (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 7th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 5th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 7th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 127.4+21% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GA102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #33 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













