
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 165W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅188.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 165W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 165W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅188.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌234.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 165W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 188.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 22,713+189% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+639% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2535 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 136+143% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.3 MB+389% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 288 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-55% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 137.7+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 70.1% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 16% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+16% | 45.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













