GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 425W, a 350W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅291.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌973.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 425W vs 75W.
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 30,725 — the GeForce RTX 4090 D leads by 290.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 30,725+290% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 14592+1529% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS+2364% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2520 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 56 | 456+714% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 14.3 MB+1525% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 D supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D carries 24 GB. GeForce RTX 4090 D gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 687.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 4090 D. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 24 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+688% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 72 MB+7100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 140% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-82% | 425W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-65% | 850W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-10% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+45% | 72.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 90.7% cheaper ($1450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 175% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4090 D (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-91% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+175% | 19.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | December 28 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #14 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4090 D
