
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅17.9% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅17.9% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 623 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 292 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 195 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2430 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,300 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile's 17,300 — the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile leads by 119.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2430 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 17,300+120% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4608+414% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2430 MHz+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-35% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 150.4+43% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GN22-X4 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













