
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 59.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅170.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 12.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅170.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 12.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 59.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 856 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 616 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 254 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 479 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 254 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,599 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB's 22,599 — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB leads by 187.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2572 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 22,599+187% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4608+414% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 23.7 TFLOPS+694% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2572 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.5 MB+411% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 9th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 6th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-58% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 125.5+20% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 60.7% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers 12.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-61% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 59.6+13% |
| Codename | TU117 | GB206 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | April 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #60 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













