GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌26.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile's 28,280 — the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile leads by 259.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1515 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 28,280+259% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10496+1071% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+10% | 1515 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile carries 24 GB. GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) — a 600% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 24 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 896 GB/s+600% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (Blackwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Blackwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile's 95W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-21% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 297.7+184% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GN22-X11 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #não classificado |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
