G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce2 MX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce2 MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 226991.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅6249.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
❌43.1% longer card at 229mm vs 160mm.

GeForce2 MX

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 160mm instead of 229mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 262200% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 65 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 226991.9% (52.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce2 MX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce2 MX's 3 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 262200%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce2 MX uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GeForce2 MX). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1155 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
G3D Mark Score	7,869+262200%	3
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+44%	1155 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX carries 65 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 6249.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+6249%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
DirectX	12+71%	7.0
OpenGL	4.6+283%	1.2
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce2 MX). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce2 MX's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	160mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	60°C-14%
Perf/Watt	104.9+104800%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce2 MX launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce2 MX
MSRP	$149	$129-13%
Performance per Dollar	52.8	0.0
Codename	TU117	GA107
Release	April 23 2019	Maio 2022
Ranking	#323	#407

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce2 MX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.