GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce3

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 526964.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅6249.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 65 MB).
✅GeForce3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
❌38.8% longer card at 229mm vs 165mm.

GeForce3

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 229mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
234.9% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 157280% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 526964.6% (52.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce3

The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce3's 5 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 157280%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce3 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (GeForce3). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 941 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
G3D Mark Score	7,869+157280%	5
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+313%	0.7227 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+77%	941 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 carries 65 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 6249.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+6249%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.1 (GeForce3). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
DirectX	12+48%	8.1
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce3). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce3).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	None
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce3's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce3). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
TDP	75W	33W-56%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	165mm
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9+52350%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce3 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 70.1% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.0 (GeForce3) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce3
MSRP	$149-70%	$499
Performance per Dollar	52.8	0.0
Codename	TU117	GM108
Release	April 23 2019	March 13 2015
Ranking	#323	#810

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.