GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 420

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 104467.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅6249.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 65 MB).
✅GeForce4 MX 420 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

GeForce4 MX 420

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 157280% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 65 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 104467.9% (52.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 157280%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
G3D Mark Score	7,869+157280%	5
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.226 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+6%	1575 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 carries 65 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 6249.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+6249%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
DirectX	12+71%	7.0
OpenGL	4.6+207%	1.5
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce4 MX 420). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 420).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	60°C-14%
Perf/Watt	104.9+52350%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 MX 420 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 420 was 33.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 420) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 420 (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP	$149	$99-34%
Performance per Dollar	52.8+52700%	0.1
Codename	TU117	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	April 23 2019	August 1 2020
Ranking	#323	#523

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 420 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.