G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6846.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 225483% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅Measures 216mm instead of 229mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.7% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6846.9% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 112314.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 7), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 225483% (52.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 112314.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score	7,869+112314%	7
Architecture	Turing	Fermi
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+211%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+299%	0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+133%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX	12+48%	8.1
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs No.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	No
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	216mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	65°C-7%
Perf/Watt	104.9	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP	$149-50%	$299
Performance per Dollar	52.8	0.0
Codename	TU117	GF104
Release	April 23 2019	November 15 2010
Ranking	#323	#683

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.