GeForce GTX 1650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1950 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+43.1%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

4 GB 15

5,500

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+43.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 188.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 7,869).
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023

Why buy it

✅+43.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 188.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 7,869).
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 43.1% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019 and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 43.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 188.1%. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 43.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 188.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
1080p
low	94 FPS	88 FPS
medium	83 FPS	76 FPS
high	70 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	70 FPS
medium	74 FPS	61 FPS
high	60 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	27 FPS
medium	39 FPS	25 FPS
high	27 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
1080p
low	136 FPS	119 FPS
medium	113 FPS	93 FPS
high	94 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	54 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	86 FPS
medium	62 FPS	65 FPS
high	44 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	52 FPS
medium	27 FPS	39 FPS
high	21 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
1080p
low	323 FPS	248 FPS
medium	283 FPS	198 FPS
high	205 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	186 FPS
medium	202 FPS	148 FPS
high	151 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	124 FPS
medium	117 FPS	99 FPS
high	79 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
1080p
low	261 FPS	153 FPS
medium	211 FPS	119 FPS
high	191 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	77 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	112 FPS
medium	158 FPS	88 FPS
high	135 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	52 FPS
high	65 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
G3D Mark Score	7,869+43%	5,500
Architecture	Turing	Xe LPG
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896+22300%	4
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1950 MHz+17%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9	366.7+250%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50.3% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 188.5% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).