GeForce GTX 1650
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+43.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 7,869).
- ❌101.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+43% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Turing | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+22300% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1950 MHz+17% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 366.7+250% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 188.5% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+189% | 18.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | April 23 2019 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #496 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
