GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K1

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS

GRID K1

2013Core: 745 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K1 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • +1108.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $3,991 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33485.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GRID K1 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GRID K1

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (651 vs 7,869).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2678.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,140 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1108.8% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 651), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,991 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $4,140, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33485.6% (52.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K1 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GRID K1

The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID K1's 651 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1108.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1109%
651
Architecture
Turing
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1536 ×2+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+30%
2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
56
128 ×2+129%
L1 Cache
896 KB+600%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K1 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K1 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GRID K1. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K1) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_0 (GRID K1). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+3517%
2.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GRID K1 launched at $4140. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 96.4% cheaper ($3991 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (GRID K1) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID K1
MSRP
$149-96%
$4140
Performance per Dollar
52.8+26300%
0.2
Codename
TU117
GK104
Release
April 23 2019
May 11 2013
Ranking
#323
#611

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.