GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+1110.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $3,150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26704.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GRID K340 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GRID K340

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (650 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2114.1% HIGHER MSRP
$3,299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($3,299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1110.6% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 650), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,150 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $3,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 26704.2% (52.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID K340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID K340

The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID K340's 650 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1110.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID K340 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (GRID K340). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID K340
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1111%	650
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384 ×4
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+309%	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs	32+300%	8 ×4
TMUs	56+75%	32 ×4
L1 Cache	896 KB+2700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K340 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID K340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K340 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GRID K340. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.13 MB (GRID K340) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID K340
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID K340's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID K340). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID K340
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+3517%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GRID K340 launched at $3299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 95.5% cheaper ($3150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (GRID K340) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID K340
MSRP	$149-95%	$3299
Performance per Dollar	52.8+26300%	0.2
Codename	TU117	GK107
Release	April 23 2019	July 23 2013
Ranking	#323	#817

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GRID K340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.